As it’s a fairly short book, I’ll keep the review itself fairly
short too. ;-)
I managed to read it in about two days. It’s only 128 pages long
and is really the sort of book you could probably dip into when you’re wanting
to learn more about a particular word or time period. It would’ve been handy to
reference in a couple of my U211 essays.
It was an interesting read though I felt that it could’ve gone
into a little more detail on some of the terms that it used. Obviously there’s a
fine line between a quick informative little booklet and a more detailed and
longer text but, for example, ‘inkhorn term’ was used multiple times without
actually clearly explaining what it was, whereas simpler terms did get
explanations. I suppose it depends on the sorts of things that you’ve read
before. Lots of the terms I already knew but for someone who hasn’t read as many
books in such close concentration as I have might find it off-putting.
Another off-putting factor was the number of typos, in particular
there was a part where it talked about alternative forms and then gave the
example of ‘drived and drived’. I suspect that, given the context the second
‘drived’ should’ve been ‘driven’. But it was frustrating because it made me
wonder what other errors there were that I wasn’t able to recognise. For that
reason it’s perhaps a good thing that I didn’t use it in any essays!
I did feel like I already knew a lot of what Walker was talking
about and so I wasn’t surprised to see that the list of references included
books like those by David Crystal and Bill Bryson, which I’ve read myself
recently (well, relatively recently at the time when I was reading
Discovering Words). While this book was an interesting and quick read,
I can’t help but feel that the other books do it better because of the level of
detail. I think it would be better to read this first and then consult the
others for a more in depth look at the same topics.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let me know what you think. :-)