I probably don’t need to reiterate my love for Tolkien again here. Suffice to
say, I’m a huge fan and I reread several of his books every year, The Lord
of the Rings being one of those. I have several different editions and each
year I try to read a different one; last year it was the ebook version I got for
my Kindle. Originally I planned to read an early single volume edition (that I
picked up in a charity shop several years ago because I liked the cover only to
discover some time later that it was a lot older than I realised) this year, but
then someone on the HTV reading challenge picked The Fellowship of the
Ring as their challenge read, so I decided to go for my old three volume
set. If nothing else, it adds another two books to my total for the year that
way.
If you’re unfamiliar with the plot of The Two Towers, it literally
picks up right where The Fellowship of the Ring left off. In a slightly
unusual move, Tolkien devotes the first book of the volume (it’s divided into
two books) entirely to the journey of Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli, as well as the
antics of Merry and Pippin. Frodo and Sam are mentioned, but we don’t see them
at all until the second half, where they are joined by Gollum as they head
towards Mordor.
On this read I got through the first half very quickly. I suppose it just
seems like that’s the meatier part of the story. You’ve got Aragorn, Legolas and
Gimli tracking Merry and Pippin, then bumping into Gandalf, going to Edoras, the
battle of Helm’s Deep and then they head for Isengard where they are reunited
with Merry and Pippin, who after escaping from the orcs have wound up with
Treebeard, Pippin looks into the Palantir and no sooner are these few Fellowship
members reunited, than they’re being separated again. By comparison Frodo and
Sam’s attempts to get into Mordor, led by Gollum, are relatively mundane, even
with their brief spell with Faramir.
That probably makes it sound like I don’t enjoy the second half, which isn’t
true at all. I love both halves of the book, though I don’t imagine that an
author would be allowed to abandon half his characters for so long in a modern
book. I think part of my problem with it is that I prefer the hobbits when
they’re interacting with people who aren’t hobbits, they just seem more
interesting then. Two hobbits and a hobbit-like creature don’t have quite the
same draw for me; which is probably why I picked up speed around the chapters
with Faramir.
The second half also feels a lot more darker somehow. That’s not to say that
the first half isn’t dark; Boromir’s death, the orcs abducting Merry and Pippin,
Saruman’s control in Edoras, it’s all pretty dark stuff. But Frodo has the Ring,
Sam is worried about Frodo, Gollum is just unpleasant, and they’re heading for
somewhere dark and deadly. It doesn’t get much darker than that!
The hobbits always seem to be among my favourite characters. This time around
I really loved Merry and Pippin, probably another reason for my reduction in
speed on the second half of the book. I was missing them. I like that they have
just a little bit of humour in their interactions, they recover from bad
situations quite quickly and they’re just a bit fun.
On the flip side, I both hate and pity Gollum, which probably shows just what
a good author Tolkien was because I think that’s exactly how you’re supposed to
feel about him. That’s certainly how characters like Frodo, Aragorn and Gandalf
feel towards him. He makes my skin crawl, but he’s a wonderful character to
read, even if in my head now he’s less the way I used to picture him when I read
The Hobbit and more the way he is in the film. The two weren’t so very
different anyway.
I think my favourite setting has to be Edoras. I love the description of the
Golden Hall and the people there. I was never a horsey child, I was more into
dogs than horses, but I think I could learn to love horses if I got to live in
Edoras. Again, I can’t help but picture the film as I’m reading those bits.
I love to read this out loud. I was quite lucky in that one of the days I was
reading it was a day when I had the house to myself. That meant that I could
read away to my heart’s content with only the girlie!rats and Tara thinking I
was crazy, rather than anyone else. I love to say the place names and the style
of the writing. Tolkien was so careful with the way that he wrote that each word
feels like it’s exactly where it should be.
I took a month’s break between reading The Fellowship of the Ring
and The Two Towers and now I’m planning a similar break before moving
on to The Return of the King. I’m pacing myself so that I can reread
The Hobbit towards the end of the year before we go and see part two of
the films in the cinema. I reread all the Tolkien books so regularly now (and
I’ve been gradually adding to my collection) that I’m never more than a few
months away from another Tolkien book.
I still haven't read any of LotR, though I have read (and loved) the Hobbit. LotR is on my list though. Has been for a long time :)
ReplyDeleteIt took me a whole ten years to be able to get past the first three chapters of Lord of the Rings, once I did though, I loved it. :-)
DeleteI've always felt that, as much as I love Frodo and Sam, their part is more akin to melodrama and personally, I'd rather have the excitement and adventure rather than the melodrama. It's been quite some time since I've read the trilogy, well before the movies came out. I think I need to dust them off!
ReplyDeleteI think that's probably a very good way of describing the difference between the two halves of the book and why I'm more drawn to the first half.
Delete