I’ve had The Science Of Discworld on my bookcase for ages, but I held
off reading it until I got to the end of the published Discworld series (of
course, between starting to read the first of the series and getting to the end
of it a couple more books came out which pushed it down my reading list
somewhat). Technically it comes somewhere in the middle of the series, but I
don’t think I missed out on anything by waiting until the end of the series to
read it.
This book is a mix of events taking place within Unseen University, with
those chapters written by Terry Pratchett, as the Wizards manage to create
‘Roundworld’ a spherical world inside one of the rooms of the university; and
then more scientific chapters written by Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen which
explain the science behind what is actually happening at each stage of
development of ‘Roundworld’ basically explaining the evolution of our Earth.
I really enjoyed the bits set in Unseen University. They saw the Wizards
using Hex to create a universe in miniature and then trying to figure out how it
can possibly work without magic. It’s fun to see them trying to influence the
world and getting annoyed with it when things don’t work the way they expect
them to. That said, I don’t think that those chapters on their own would
necessarily work as a stand alone story without the scientific stuff to help
make sense of what the Wizards are seeing happening. It’s very clever the way
that aspects of the book go together to make the whole.
I also found the science stuff very interesting, but some of it did kind of
go over my head. Bits of it kind of reminded me of the Horrible Histories books
I used to read when I was younger (expect this is what they would’ve been like
had they been written for adults). In the beginning I struggled with the physics
stuff, but as the world developed into something recognisable to me and it
started talking about dinosaurs and evolution I started to feel a little more at
home. Though I couldn’t help but think that some of the descriptions could have
done with diagrams to illustrate what was being said.
When I first started reading this book I didn’t think I was going to get into
it the way I did. In the beginning I kept on looking forward to the Discworld
bits because I struggled with some of the scientific bits, but as I went on I
got into it more and more. By the end I think I was enjoying the two different
texts fairly equally. I’d definitely like to look out for more of the Science of
Discworld books (as well as any other books which offer comparisons between
Discworld and the real world).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let me know what you think. :-)